fallacy.wiki

A field guide to the ways reasoning breaks

Broken structure

Affirming a disjunct

Also called Inclusive or error

What it is

Assuming that because one option in an or statement is true, the other must be false.

In the wild

She is in sales or marketing; she is in sales, so she is not in marketing.

How to answer it

Ask whether the or was meant as exclusive. Usually both can hold.

In depth

Origin and naming

The name describes the move: one half of an 'or' statement is affirmed, and from that the other half is denied. The error comes from reading 'or' as exclusive — at most one option true — when ordinary usage is often inclusive, and both can hold at once.

More places it shows up

  1. The outage was caused by the database or the cache; we confirmed the database, so the cache is fine.

  2. He is on leave for family reasons or burnout; HR confirmed family reasons, so it is not burnout.

  3. The delay came from the vendor or from our own approvals; the vendor was late, so our approvals are cleared.

  4. Users churn because of price or features; the survey says price, so the feature roadmap is not the problem.

How to spot it

  • Notice when 'or' is quietly being treated as 'exactly one of these,' with no argument for why.
  • Notice when confirming one option is used to close the investigation instead of narrow it.
  • Notice when both things being true would explain the evidence better than either alone.

Read more