Origin and naming
The invalid mirror of affirming the consequent: the second premise negates the 'if' half of a conditional, and from that the 'then' half is denied. Also called inverse error. Alan Turing planted one deliberately in his 1950 paper on machine intelligence as an example of tempting but broken reasoning.
More places it shows up
- 01
If the merger goes through, the stock will jump; the merger fell through, so the stock won't move — said the day before earnings.
- 02
If we advertise, sales will grow; we're not advertising this quarter, so sales can't grow.
- 03
If the code has a bug, the tests fail; the tests pass, so the code is fine — ignoring that the tests only cover half the paths.
- 04
If interest rates rise, the housing market cools; rates didn't rise, so the market must be heating up.
How to spot it
- Notice when the shape is 'if A then B; A didn't happen; so B won't' — ask whether B has other doors.
- Notice when the argument treats one trigger as if it were the only switch wired to the outcome.
- Notice when denying the condition is presented as denying the result, even though the result can arrive by another route.