fallacy.wiki

A field guide to the ways reasoning breaks

Broken structure

Fallacy of four terms

Also called Quaternio terminorum

What it is

A syllogism that looks valid but uses four terms because one word shifted meaning.

In the wild

Nothing is better than wisdom; a sandwich is better than nothing; so a sandwich beats wisdom.

How to answer it

Count the distinct concepts, not the distinct words. A valid syllogism has exactly three.

In depth

Origin and naming

Quaternio terminorum — 'four terms' — names a syllogism that carries one term too many. A valid categorical syllogism needs exactly three: the two in the conclusion plus the middle that links them. In practice the fourth term is usually smuggled in by one word doing double duty, which makes this fallacy a close cousin of equivocation.

More places it shows up

  1. Banks deal with money; the river has banks; so the river deals with money.

  2. Justice requires blind judgment; a referee is blind to the replay; so referees are just.

  3. Stars light up the sky; celebrities are stars; so celebrities light up the sky.

  4. Iron is an element; you iron a shirt; so pressing shirts involves chemistry homework.

How to spot it

  • Notice when the middle word appears twice but no paraphrase can give it one consistent meaning both times.
  • Notice when a joke-style riddle is doing the job of an argument — surprise at the wordplay is often the tell.
  • Notice when the premises are each trivially true and the conclusion absurd; the leak is usually a fourth term.

Read more