fallacy.wiki

A field guide to the ways reasoning breaks

Broken structure

Illicit major

Also called Illicit process of the major term

What it is

Drawing a conclusion about all of a category from a premise that covered only part of it.

In the wild

All cats are mammals; no dogs are cats, so no dogs are mammals.

How to answer it

Check whether the premise really covered every member of the term in the conclusion.

In depth

Origin and naming

One of the two classic distribution errors in categorical syllogisms. 'Illicit' marks that the major term — the term in the conclusion's predicate — is claimed about its whole class in the conclusion even though the premises only talked about part of it. It is the structural twin of the illicit minor.

More places it shows up

  1. All managers are accountable for the budget; no intern is a manager; so no intern is accountable for the budget — while interns sign for petty cash every week.

  2. All certified auditors may sign off on the report; she is not a certified auditor; so she may not sign — overlooking the partner who co-signs.

  3. All encryption keys are stored in the vault; this token is not an encryption key; so it is not in the vault — and it is.

  4. All senior staff have building access; contractors are not senior staff; so contractors can't enter the building — said at the door where they badge in daily.

How to spot it

  • Notice when the conclusion makes a sweeping 'no' or 'all' claim about a class the premises never fully covered.
  • Notice when the pattern is 'all A are B; C is not A; so C is not B' — the shape alone should raise the flag.
  • Notice when the conclusion excludes something from a class using premises that never said who else belongs to that class.

Read more