Origin and naming
The image is classical: Cicero has Laelius warn that affairs, once started, glide readily down the path of ruin. In modern logic Alfred Sidgwick described it in 1910 as the 'thin end of a wedge' objection, and English-language debate has kept the slope picture ever since — lawyers prefer a 'parade of horribles', politicians a 'camel's nose in the tent'.
More places it shows up
- 01
If we let the intern present to the client today, next year interns will be running whole accounts.
- 02
If the city approves one food truck on this street, the block will turn into a permanent market.
- 03
Let them move one deadline and soon no date in the calendar will mean anything.
- 04
Allow one chart to skip review and the whole data culture collapses into guesswork.
How to spot it
- The argument jumps from the first step to the last without ever pricing the middle steps.
- Each 'and then' is treated as obvious; nobody says how probable any link actually is.
- The endpoint is much scarier than the proposal on the table, which is the point of choosing it.